re: answer

Current Events » in reply to re: Which didn't answer your question, by the way.

re: answer

Tom Brosz — 10/3/2006 6:40:49 PM (archived)

I would not approve of a full-scale attack on Iran's facilities at this time. Does that answer your question? Point is, it ain't gonna happen.

I would also not approve of Bush reinstating the draft, nuking Mecca, or running down Pennsylvania Avenue naked, brandishing a Norse war axe, and yelling berserker battle cries. I'm not worried about those things happening either.

Although I'm cheerfully branded a Bush toady by various vast, cool and unsympathetic intellects here, I also strongly disapproved of Bush failing to rein in spending, keeping Tenet on for CIA, picking Norm Mineta for Transportation, wimping out on Linda Chavez, trying to put tariffs on steel, signing No Child Left Behind with Ted Kennedy, failing to deal with the immigration problem, leaving lousy agriculture policies in place, failing to back the pilots in the armed pilots debate, not vetoing McCain-Feingold (or anything else), implementing an unneeded new Medicare entitlement, and picking Meirs for Supreme Court.

The whole thread (30 posts)

US Navy sends armada of ships to the Persian Gulf, including the nuclear aircraft carrier Eisenhower - Lindy - 10/3/2006 12:38:41 AM
- re: US Navy sends armada of ships to the Persian Gulf, including the nuclear aircraft carrier Eisenhower - Rob - 12/21/2006 6:52:34 PM
- re: US Navy sends armada of ships to the Persian Gulf, including the nuclear aircraft carrier Eisenhower - RNE - 10/3/2006 5:05:31 PM
  - Well, what do I know? - Lindy - 10/3/2006 8:37:31 PM
- Remember what happened to the Armada. - ER - 10/3/2006 1:22:53 PM
  - If just the destination part of the story is true... - alcaray - 10/3/2006 4:17:07 PM
    - re: If just the destination part of the story is true... - ER - 10/3/2006 5:46:59 PM
  - Thanks for the insider's view - Lindy - 10/3/2006 2:57:13 PM
  - Touche on the last line. (n/t) - azstrummer - 10/3/2006 1:57:46 PM
- re: Eisenhower - Tom Brosz - 10/3/2006 3:08:42 AM
  - a hypothetical - azstrummer - 10/3/2006 5:15:10 AM
    - re: another hypothetical - Scott Evil - 10/3/2006 2:19:49 PM
    - Who would go to war with Iran with only two carrier battle groups? - Lee - 10/3/2006 7:31:29 AM
      - Yep, just like we did with the Iraqis, Afghanis and Vietnamese. (n/t) - ER - 10/3/2006 12:53:35 PM
        
        I recall people arguing that we took Iraq too fast. - Scott Evil - 10/3/2006 2:16:08 PM
        
        "Taken" Iraq? Define that, if you will. - Bowser - 10/3/2006 2:33:55 PM
        
        What a lame attempt at argumentation... - Scott Evil - 10/3/2006 2:37:01 PM
        
        Heh, heh. Good thing I don't suggest you are in school!!! - Bowser - 10/3/2006 3:43:48 PM
    - re: a hypothetical - Tom Brosz - 10/3/2006 5:23:11 AM
      - A well measured response. Thanks (n/t) - azstrummer - 10/3/2006 1:55:48 PM
        
        Which didn't answer your question, by the way. (n/t) - Bowser - 10/3/2006 3:44:45 PM
        
        re: Which didn't answer your question, by the way. - azstrummer - 10/3/2006 5:27:19 PM
        
        re: answer - Tom Brosz - 10/3/2006 6:40:49 PM
        
        Thanks again. - azstrummer - 10/3/2006 9:58:45 PM
        
        Outrage - Tom Brosz - 10/4/2006 12:03:11 AM
        
        re: Outrage - Lindy - 10/4/2006 12:31:14 AM
      - Gee... - Donald - 10/3/2006 1:08:44 PM
        
        re: Actually, we wouldn't be opening a third front in the Middle East. - Scott Evil - 10/3/2006 2:23:00 PM
        
        It's a matter of interpretation... - ER - 10/3/2006 3:19:29 PM
        
        It's rhetorical Scott... - Donald - 10/3/2006 3:01:06 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (30 posts)