An attempt at humor working on two levels. Apparently worked on no levels.
level 1) You made a teasing reference to repressed homosexuality implied by Tech's fascination with the topic. I implied (teasingly, I intended) that Tech's going for underage boys did not mean he was gay.
level 2) I made reference to the point that "going for underage boys not making you gay" is a reversal of the truth (discussed in some threads and in the news lately) that being gay does not make you go for underage boys.