I hate to sound like a dick but yes, you failed to make your views clear. You absolutely come accross like you are convinced human-caused global warming is not happening. Apparently I failed to make my point as well, for hard as I try I can't seem to get through.
One more try in terms you can relate to: yes I am actually not 100% sure of global warming being a reality. I strongly suspect it is true based on the data but total certainty for me is not there. What I am certain of is THE CONSEQUENCES OF IGNORING THE PROBLEM if it is indeed real. THAT is the point I keep trying to make. That was the point of the opening post in this thread. The consequences of inaction are so great that to deny it based on claims it is a massive global con job is morally irresponisble and intellectually dishonest. To call for no action at all based on what you consider inconclusive data is not as bad but still doesn't take into account the potential catestrophic consequences of inaction.
Space/Science » in reply to clarity
re: clarity
