Whilst the language was not overtly offensive, the attitude is disappointing. Please get used to the new editorial policy round here.
There is a clear distinction between protesting your case, and insulting your opponent. If you can't distinguish it, then don't post at all here.
EP, consider yourself on a behaviour warning. Try to keep the insults and rudeness out of the subject titles, at least.
A good discipline for posting is to compose your answer in a seperate word-processor window and save it. Come back 10 minutes later and re-read your message. If you have any doubts about the content after this reflection, then rewrite it, or delete it.
Hitting the "send" button when you're riled-up is not a smart move, imho...
Space/Science » in reply to Excuse ME
A second gratuitous insult by EP has been deleted
The whole thread (21 posts)
- If you had economy of scale, what would be cheapest conventional rocket to get a lot of a mass to orbit?
- Your framework of assumptions is completely unrealistic
- Musk's "Falcon" launchers are turbopump fed.
- I am an engineer just trying to understand design space tradeoffs
- Why the snark? If you don't want to play then don't play. (n/t)
- re: If you had economy of scale, what would be cheapest conventional rocket to get a lot of a mass to orbit?
- SeaDragon is one end of the curve
- Your framework of assumptions is completely unrealistic
