The problem is I have a lot to do and no time to bring people up to speed with long multiple-linked research projects. Especially since I have been made aware that very few people bother to read any of the references.

The new game did not "catch people's attention." This completely synthetic controversy has been ginned up the the organizations mentioned in the original article, including mass e-mail attacks and other methods of going after Wal-Mart. And only Wal-Mart, oddly enough. Wonder why.

You want some background, do some research on these groups. They make a career of this kind of crap. This is a real issue only in their own minds.

When I pick out an extreme example of something and post it here, I'm dragged over the coals for trying to draw a broader conclusion based on a small segment of society. Why should you get away with it?

Incidentally, the only political representative who actually HAD underage sex with a page was a Democrat. He remained in office, was given posts of authority, and was lauded through his entire career and after his recent death.