If I was one of those few who are falsely detained by the government for suspicion of terrorism, I would probably be pissed about it (I would cooperate, but wouldn’t be happy about it). But considering our government has stopped several terrorist attacks on our soil since 9/11, security is doing something right.
Is it worth inconveniencing a few for the security of the country? The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one? (brings a tear to the eye- sniff. Sorry, a Trek flashback). I think so.
I don’t think we are loosing our civil liberties. I have yet to see anything but a lot of unsupported hype and rumors on this.
Like I said before, I am really not worried about it. I think those who are are being paranoid. Bu if they want to keep any eye on the government, then more power to them.
Flame » in reply to Reading 101
re: Reading 101
The whole thread (66 posts)
- My throat is exposed....This is Flame afterall....
- Coinkidinkally..........
- re: My throat is exposed....This is Flame afterall....
- Good for you, I have a job for you in my saloon..
- :) (n/t)
- How long have you been clean and sober?
- Alas, not very long....
- " I really feel that the more the Government gets involved the more we lose our freedom."
- You are right
- I was wrong. Only one libertarian here.....
- No, she isnt.
- See?....
- re: No, she isnt.
- You are right
- re: Alas, not very long....
- " I really feel that the more the Government gets involved the more we lose our freedom."
- So you got that reference,eh?...he he
- Alas, not very long....
- I will RARELY argue politics though..I KNOW I will get my ass kicked (n/t)
- Oh my, they're multiplying!
- A Libertarian is just an Anarchist with property. (n/t)