Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to "String-nets" and the electron as a constant receiver

re: "String-nets" and the electron as a constant receiver
Marcia — (archived)

[They are pointing out that the electrons move and demonstrate that they are connected to something else. Anyone who has read Atomic Vortex Theory should be somewhat familiar with the concept. However, I coined the term "atomic vortex" to describe the properties of electrons and particle movement around the nucleus as part of a field of energy. "String-nets" doesn't nearly as well convey the real picture. The particles indeed are connected by streams of energy, but electron spin and charge is a function of the data being delivered along these streams, which is what they have attempted to prove.

What they are saying is that something is still missing from the picture. How can electrons hold half a charge? The answer (which is obvious of course ;-) is that the electron is a grouping of waves that is being fed data and its spin is the byproduct of polar field interaction with other parts of the atom. The 1/2 charge electrons have less wave forms with a negative bias.]

I think that the momentum in which they were excited has a lot to do with them still maintaining that half charge. Not sure about "being fed data", maybe it is momentum and it's rate. I can't help but think that matter and momentum has to play a part in this. The energy from momentum has to have a great deal to do with it. As for the way they spin, maybe that's just the way they behave, 'carry their weight'.

Vague, but I'm a novice.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (45 posts)