Indeed! Now that's the SDAI TechDude I know and love! Absolutely brilliant parody of either scientific prose or pseudoscience gibberish. Or does it really matter? It sounds like a psychiatrist/semiotician cross-trained as a Velikovskian astrophysicist: in the great tradition of Gracie Allen and Yogi Berra, with perhaps just a little Casey Stengel thrown in to keep it accessible to the rest of us. Unfortunately, I haven't read much Atomic Vortex Theory, so I'm having trouble following the more subtle points, but I am in awe (and shocked too!).
It's a discovery that ranks right up there with the morning-after birth control pill for men, and the time-release placebo.
Flame » in reply to "String-nets" and the electron as a constant receiver
"the white paper was written in typically obfuscating style"
The whole thread (45 posts)
- Question: interesting info from a lousy source
- On looking at the question further...
- re: I think so
- Can you please just spare me the sillyness? (n/t)
- re: Please explain where the “sillyness†part is? (n/t)
- Oh good lord. If I have to explain it to you.... (n/t)
- re: Please explain where the “sillyness†part is? (n/t)
- Can you please just spare me the sillyness? (n/t)
- Gotta luv modern theoretical physics
- re: Question: interesting info from a lousy source
- "String-nets" and the electron as a constant receiver
- re: "String-nets" and the electron as a constant receiver
- My computer and other objects in the room started to levitate as I read your post.
- "the white paper was written in typically obfuscating style"
- Robert, can we use the 'fund' to just shoot him? (n/t)
- No,seriously....
- Don't take it so seriously.
- re: the only difference between cutting-edge theoretical physicists and SDAI
- re: the only difference
- What the hell is the point of even having a Space Science board here?
- re: the only difference
- re: the only difference between cutting-edge theoretical physicists and SDAI
- "String-nets" and the electron as a constant receiver
