I'm sorry, but when you say that you've actually "talked to people that have said that they don't remember the U.S. as being harsh masters"? Ok, I don't remember that either, and I lived in Cuba for the most part of the sixties. Of course they don't remember, they didn't live through it, but you, ER, are the one insiduating that the U.S. must have been a harsh master. "Model colonizers"? I think the U.S. was very civil and it took two to tango (trade).
My point is that the U.S. was never a colonizer of Cuba, Puerto Rico or even the Philippines. IF they were, they'd still be in power. You read that one again. On the other hand, Castro is and was never democratically voted to be in the first place. Now there's a hostile takeover.
Off Topic » in reply to Read again what I said.
re: Read again what I said. - I did.
The whole thread (29 posts)
- Homage to a Government
- Ahh, money. And the reason they were there in the first place was - - - ?
- Epitaph for an Empire
- Empire and the U.S.
- re: Epitaph for an Empire
- re: Epitaph for an Empire
- Another Epitaph for an Empire
- He would have fit right in here in the Zone.
- re: Epitaph for an Empire
