Basically, if it's a case of privacy, a chip of this type is on a level with a camera posted near you or at a doorway. Chips require a device quite close by to "read" them. There are no microchips capable of being read from a great distance to "track" somebody. Such a device would be about the size of a small cell phone, and require a power source.
A lot would depend on what the chip has on it for data. Most ID chips for pets have a simple number that can be used to contact their owners.
I seriously don't think this is an issue. Such chips will see far more use in things like inventory management and product security.
Off Topic » in reply to "there is little that the chip would do that has not already been common practice for years. "
Chips
The whole thread (48 posts)
- Are you ready to be chipped THE MARK OF THE BEAST
- We already ARE chipped.
- 666 reasons for concern
- Just curious...why don't you mind having a Social Security number?
- Did all the Libertarians migrate to the Democratic party? (n/t)
- "there is little that the chip would do that has not already been common practice for years. "
- Completely painless
- Chips
- Currently, that is true. Likely not true in 10 years. (n/t)
- Maybe. Not easy, though.
- The chips need not broadcast far if the sensors are everywhere. (n/t)
- Do I have to spell it out? Don't get the damn chip!
- The chips need not broadcast far if the sensors are everywhere. (n/t)
- Maybe. Not easy, though.
- re: Chips
- Currently, that is true. Likely not true in 10 years. (n/t)
- re: Just curious...seems that she does mind.
