First, anything that large is going to have errors of some magnitude. A problem is that small or inconsequential problems become equated in the less educated mind with major issues. Drudgereport, for instance, seems to give long headlines to anything which opposes climate warming. There may be 100 articles for, 2 against, and Drudge headlines 2 on each side.

Second, to say it lacks balance is a complete judgement call. And folks have the privilege, still, of forming their own judgements.

Third, on a matter such as this, enormous sums are available to discredit anything which opposes the immediate corporate good. Shortsightedness is a trait of capitalism, the immediate profit being paramount to the CEOs bonus.

Overall, I think it's about Gore 98, anti-Gore 2. Which is virtually untouched, given the issue and stakes.

Arf