Blurring the lines
I've never denied the existence of rightwing terrorists- where did you get that?
Lost change? I did not reduce the rightwing column by what are obviously not terrorist
acts. At the same time I did not include the incidences that were “half right” from the
Big List.
"Rules of analysis", I wasn't following any rules but my own in showing two sources that
tallied the attacks. I attempted a "fair" presentation, believe it or not.
Lee Boyd Malvo: "...was charged by the Commonwealth of Virginia for two capital crimes: the murder of FBI analyst Linda Franklin "in the commission of an act of
terrorism"
John Allen Muhammad: "America got what it deserved" in the Sept. 11, 2001"
Wiki
You know what they did. They were Muslims and terrorists. Don't know how you could say
otherwise with any intellectual integrity.
If that’s your criteria for blaming terrorism on a religion, you’ve just
implicated Christianity in most of the mass murders in America for the last century or so.
So what? I really don't care.
Brandishing firearms a violent and terroristic act? Quit blowing bubbles in your milk.I suggest you read the Big List. I don't think you looked at it.
I know the difference between bigot and racist. A lot of liberals don't. Any negative
adjective they can find will be gleefully hung around the necks of all conservatives-
over and over, ad nauseam.