re: Could you be more specific in your objection to my “hunch�
You state that:
If you're going to bring up a theory, at least be complete on your analysis.
Then you state that:
any inference that the few nuke plants around the world are a significant contributor to weather changes is an unprovable stretch
I do not understand your reasoning.
What difference would the â€complete analysis†make if the theory is “unprovableâ€?
