Off Topic » in reply to re: informative post

The whole thread (23 posts)

• Connecting dots - Johannes - 1/29/2008 9:09:07 PM
  • Not only, but also - Tony - 1/30/2008 3:59:15 PM
    • re: wee flaw ? - Johannes - 2/1/2008 8:27:40 PM
      • re: wee flaw ? - alcaray - 2/1/2008 9:51:00 PM
        • re: Are the French still exploding nukes on pacific islands? (n/t) - Johannes - 2/2/2008 3:06:30 AM
          • NO !!!!! All made through computer simulations (n/t) - Raoul - 2/2/2008 11:12:15 PM
  • Johannes.... - Jody - 1/30/2008 12:44:39 PM
    • re: Eviscerated :-) - Johannes - 2/1/2008 5:53:38 AM
  • All that needs to be said... - ARRELL - 1/30/2008 6:05:45 AM
    • re: Does your math - Johannes - 2/3/2008 1:47:40 AM
  • re: Connecting dots - TB - 1/29/2008 11:37:42 PM
    • re: Thank you for the reminder. - Johannes - 1/30/2008 3:57:28 AM
      • Let's not confuse cause and effect. - TB - 1/30/2008 4:10:43 AM
        • re: The WHY question still remains. (n/t) - Johannes - 2/4/2008 3:40:47 AM
  • Why are you just concerned with the nuclear plants? - azstrummer - 1/29/2008 9:28:55 PM
    • re: Could you be more specific in your objection to my “hunch”? - Johannes - 1/29/2008 10:46:53 PM
      • Look - azstrummer - 1/30/2008 4:45:24 AM
        • re: informative post - Johannes - 2/1/2008 6:00:39 AM
          • If you continue to "elude" the facts, they will never catch you. (n/t) - alcaray - 2/1/2008 9:53:28 PM
            • re: Have you verified RLs calculations? (n/t) - Johannes - 2/2/2008 3:13:22 AM
              • All it takes is a calculator and grade school math... - ARRELL - 2/2/2008 3:22:10 PM
              • I was teasing you for your misuse of the word. - alcaray - 2/2/2008 4:42:01 AM
                • re:Thanks :-) - Johannes - 2/3/2008 2:07:27 AM