"...that in the past, many Republicans supported the Green party candidates in general and Nader specifically. I provided some of that evidence, here, a little more than 2 years ago."
Well, democrats voted for Reagan.
Coulter said she voting for Clinton if Clinton wins, though perhaps that isn't a good example.
Some Republicans can buy into disliking big business as much the stupid lefties:
McCain for example:
"The latest evidence came during the January 5, 2008 Republican candidates’ debate in Manchester, New Hampshire, when Senator McCain slurred the pharmaceutical industry as “the big bad guys.” Thus, in addition to his dubious positions on tax cuts, waterboarding of terrorists and McCain/Feingold’s free speech restrictions, he has now gone on record attacking America’s pharmaceutical companies, which constitute one of this country’s most innovative and valuable industries."
cfif.org
Just because some Republicans support some weird candidate doesn't mean much- Ron Paul is pretty kooky, and not only Republicans supported that fool. But I wouldn't say the Democrats finance the guy.
"At the moment, I think it's too early to say that anyone supports Nader. We will see what he says on Sunday. It seems very reasonable that if he runs, then Republicans will again support him."
Yeah sure some Republicans might give him some money and possibly vote for him, but this isn't the same as "The Republicans are financing the guy, of course."
Current Events » in reply to There's a great deal of evidence...
re: There's a great deal of evidence...
The whole thread (32 posts)
- Ralph Nader is probably going for it again
- maybe that Shehan Kook can be his running mate.
- re: Ralph Nader
