A little knowledge is a dangerous thing in this issue, and a lot of people are blowing smoke in the bargain.
I am inherently suspicious of any science work, on either side of this issue, that requires several pages of heavy statistical math to get to where the authors are trying to go. The beauty of major ideas in science is that, with very few exceptions, they can be described and explained in terms understandable to a reasonably intelligent layman.
RealClimate is a good site, in that it attracts a lot of smart people on both sides. Still, it does have an inherent bias, and even reasonable skeptical commenters find themselves swimming against a distinct current. It's useful to realize that both sides have an axe to grind, and it's not just objective, incorruptible scientists versus corrupt, oil-company-paid hacks.
Flame » in reply to Black body radiators
Heh.
The whole thread (37 posts)
- Forget global warming: Welcome to the new Ice Age
- A Saturated Gassy Argument
- Please select one of the following options
- re:one AND five are correct
- What was the atmospheric pressure at sealevel in 1940. What is it today?
- Nooooooooooooooooo
- Yes Tony.... Search your feelings.... you know it to be true...
- re: Yes Tony and brothers L. I will start my research on the subject if
- re: Yes Tony and brothers L. I will start my research on the subject if
- Because your memory of a book you read long ago...
- re: Yes Tony and brothers L. I will start my research on the subject if
- Yes Tony.... Search your feelings.... you know it to be true...
- Nooooooooooooooooo
- What was the atmospheric pressure at sealevel in 1940. What is it today?
- re: Please select one of the following options
- re: options
- re: Please select one of the following options
- re:one AND five are correct
