:) So..... are you saying you DIDN'T find that link on a blog? That your interpretation of that exchange ISN'T identical to the interpretation given you on that blog?
Let's just recap what happened here, since you seem in need of some help....
You, in typical fashion, made a post that consists only of a link to a site- the ONLY analysis you offer is "Sausage being made"....
I respond by going over the claims in your link point by point, analyzing the premise and I reference a link to the article in question- something you did not do, and in fact I seriously doubt you even attempted to find and read the article in question- Do you really want to compare who did more research and thought in this thread TB?
There is a REASON that your blogs didn't link to the article in question, it wasn't because they were too lazy to do so, it was because if you actually read the article it tends to ruin the spin that the blogs are trying to put on it... That is why I provided the obvious link while they, and you, didn't!
If you dont want to be viewed as a mindless blog-quoting boob, then stop acting like one!
Current Events » in reply to BTW...
re: BTW...
The whole thread (28 posts)
- How the BBC writes climate stories
- re: How the BBC writes climate stories... And how TB gets his talking points spoon-fed to him....
- re: How the BBC writes climate stories
- Jo Abbess
