re: The original article

Current Events » in reply to The original article I was referring to is the BBC article that started the exchange...

re: The original article

TB — 4/13/2008 10:18:37 PM (archived)

Of course I read it. Both versions. Frankly, the changes weren't the issue, the reasons for them were.

The writer was threatened by an activist, he made changes in a news article without making note of it online (which the BBC now says they should have done), and asked the activist if she liked the new version. I'm not sure there's any way to make this simpler.

The whole thread (28 posts)

How the BBC writes climate stories - TB - 4/13/2008 2:31:00 AM
- re: How the BBC writes climate stories... And how TB gets his talking points spoon-fed to him.... - ARRELL - 4/13/2008 11:20:23 AM
  - BTW... - TB - 4/13/2008 5:02:26 PM
    - re: BTW... - ARRELL - 4/13/2008 6:21:53 PM
      - re: BTW... - TB - 4/13/2008 7:09:17 PM
        
        BBC's "Nature" link is bad. - TB - 4/13/2008 10:33:26 PM
        
        The original article I was referring to is the BBC article that started the exchange... - ARRELL - 4/13/2008 9:59:44 PM
        
        re: The original article - TB - 4/13/2008 10:18:37 PM
        
        Simple as it gets - ARRELL - 4/13/2008 11:57:58 PM
        
        Give it up. - TB - 4/14/2008 1:53:13 AM
        
        IF you would actually read the article you would see the changes that she requested were not made! - ARRELL - 4/14/2008 4:01:10 AM
        
        Actually... - TB - 4/14/2008 4:15:05 AM
        
        re: Simple as it gets - gbaikie - 4/14/2008 1:05:10 AM
        
        re: The original article - gbaikie - 4/13/2008 11:35:11 PM
    - Sputter Much? - Yeti - 4/13/2008 5:25:16 PM
  - Like the other post you "didn't get," it stands on its own. - TB - 4/13/2008 4:41:01 PM
    - It pretty much HAS to stand on its own, any facts on the issue tend to make the spin fall flat... - ARRELL - 4/13/2008 8:54:14 PM
    - Not really. - Yeti - 4/13/2008 5:13:55 PM
    - Meanwhile, back at those "ocean temperatures" she was talking about... - TB - 4/13/2008 4:44:35 PM
      - The NPR information is out of date - Laurie Street - 4/14/2008 5:17:31 AM
        
        Thanks! That's an important piece of info. - TB - 4/14/2008 6:58:16 AM
  - Save your breath. - ER - 4/13/2008 1:10:47 PM
    - Pass the ammo. - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/13/2008 8:29:25 PM
      - Maybe "predators" was too strong a word. - ER - 4/13/2008 8:44:17 PM
        
        Parasites or predators. - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/13/2008 9:06:29 PM
- re: How the BBC writes climate stories - pb - 4/13/2008 10:19:27 AM
  - "emerging truth" - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/13/2008 8:41:46 PM
- Jo Abbess - gbaikie - 4/13/2008 4:44:11 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (28 posts)