I see what you are saying, but it’s still just his word against the others. In court cases, testimony is allowed to sway the jury, but it is up to the jury to decide if they are telling the truth or lying (And the lawyers to sway them one way or the other)
I heard Karl Rove denounce one of McClellan accusations. So how do we know who is telling the truth without some concrete evidence?- which I have not seen from either.
It’s just Rove’s word against McClellan. Are both their testimonies valid? For me, neither is unless they can back it up with something. This is not a court case so we have to act as jury and decide based on what is presented to us. Right now, all I see one side verses the other with nothing to back them up.
There is too much lying gong on in the political world. I don’t think it’s too much to ask politicians to back up their claims.
Current Events » in reply to testimony *equals* evidence
Doen't he have to swear on the Bible first? :)
The whole thread (34 posts)
- Quotations from Chairman Ann
- It's all about money and power.
- I'm puzzled.
- And from Comrade Limbaugh:
- I don't listen to Rush
- The official party line is almost done...
- Yup, thats the one they are going to run with...for now (And now a prediction)
- re: Yup, thats the one they are going to run with...for now (And now a prediction)
- Liberal publishers publish liberal books. Alert the media.
- Michael Reagan link
- Yup, thats the one they are going to run with...for now (And now a prediction)