Off Topic — HabitableZone

Off Topic » in reply to re: Religious dogma

re: Religious dogma
TB — (archived)

I didn't spew jingoism. I showed that there was nothing in the real world to support your premise.

You're welcome to bring some real numbers to show that the wealth and benefit flow goes the other way, from "the people" to businesses and the wealthy, to do that "full and honest accounting" you were talking about. Look at R.L.'s example to see how it's done.

That "social credits" are just another form of political wealth redistribution is so obvious it's depressing I have to point it out more than once. Do you think there will be a "means test" thrown in? Will Bill Gates get his alms too, or not? And how would that compare to what he's putting INTO the kitty?

Spewing horseshit is not an argument, particularly when nine times out of ten you aren't even answering the point I made. You seem desperate to keep every discussion off of hard facts and into the airy realm of intangibles.

"rational discussion?" As if I'm the one who started pumping "religion" and "dogma" into a simple economic analysis.

You're eloquent, but you have no frigging idea what you're talking about in the area of economics. This has pretty much gotten to the same point as discussing HAARP with Lindy.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (45 posts)