Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to What's the perormance differences between SRBs and liquid fueled replacements?

re: What's the perormance differences between SRBs and liquid fueled replacements?

Hi Lee -

Yes, they were put forward twice: once at shuttle development, and once after Challenger.

The big difference in performance is that liquids can be shut down, which gives you more abort modes.

As to ISP and size, if I remember right the lilquids have a higher ISP.

The real advantage to the initial proposals would have been the extremely low cost. Thus as stand alone units they would have dominated the commercial launch market.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (23 posts)