"It's glaringly obvious that you're trying the wannabe-Rove strategy of distracting with irrelevant trivia. Even if you'd gotten it right about when Gibson gave up in disgust and fed her the answer, so what? Would that make Sarah Palin suddenly clueful? Would it erase from history her attempts to bullshit her way through the questions?"
You are missing the obvious that there isn't one Bush doctrine.
For instance if you asked President Bush what the Bush doctrine was, what would he say it was?
Now, I realize that [in leftyland] what the press says is the Bush doctrine while they drinks cocktails, is *actually* what the true Bush doctrine is. Meaning it can't *actually* be Bush's doctrine because Bush is too stupid to actually have a doctrine.
But the question is how drunk do reporters have to get before the real Bush doctrine is discussed?
Current Events » in reply to Totally clueless II
re: Totally clueless II
The whole thread (46 posts)
- Bush doctrine
- Totally clueless
- re: Totally clueless
- You shouldn't be so harsh, Robert.
- re: Bush doctrine
- I thought the Bush Doctrine was to make the oil company executives rich...
- Typical Krauthammering nitpick CYA maneuver.
- Odd that I, and most other observers, knew exactly what he was referring to....
- If you read Krauthammer regularly, you probably do believe Bush is a liberal. (n/t)
- "I've said Bush's foreign policy is liberal rather than conservative." So much for you. (n/t)
- Totally clueless