I'm not sure how he should have answered it but I think your assessment is correct regarding his concern that opponents would say he was coddling.
The problem with all candidates is they answer in ways to head off or appease their opponents and the more it goes against their character and nature the harder it is to give a cogent answer. I would prefer total honesty from candidates but I know that is too much to expect.
It leaves us wondering what they would really do. There are those that hope that Obama will be the ultimate coddler, as there are some who hope McCain will nuke our enemies but most hope that the winner will just make wise decisions and take good advice. The political rhetoric gives us no way to really know.
I honestly believe that McCain has a distinct advantage over Obama in the area of international affairs but this does not neccessarily mean Obama would be a failure in this area. Neither is likely to make important decisions based solely on their personal knowlege and experience.
It would be nice to know who each has in mind for key cabinet posts and staff positions before the election.
Current Events » in reply to I agree with you on that.
the correct way for Obama to answer that question
The whole thread (25 posts)
- Obama not ready for prime-time.
- re: Obama not ready for prime-time.
- Obama performed far better than McCain, and won the debate
- re: Can you say; John McCain is absolutely right!
- Obama did NOT say he wanted to INVADE Pakistan
- Cooperation from Pakistan is what we need
- re: Emotional quiver?
- Under THIS president we have shot at pakistani soldiers, and attacked targets in Pakistan... (n/t)
- Obama did NOT say he wanted to INVADE Pakistan
- I still don't know... Did Obama say he supports the bail out plan?
- I think every one of those was a minority opinion.
- re: Obama maybe not quite ready for prime-time.
