is that despite you and the pollster attempting to show that people were misinformed about the issues they asked about, overwhelmingly the people were correct. People payed attention to those issues not only because were they sensational but what made them even more so was that there was huge evidence that proved them beyond a shadow of a doubt. We could watch Palin with our own eyes stumbling over questions that most school board members could answer much less a governor of a state. We could hear the absurd statement about foreign policy experience because she could see Russia from her house. Nobody had to dig for that crap or take it out of context.
There was no exaggeration involved compared to the crap on the other side. The deeper you dug into the bizarre world of Sarah Palin, the crazier it became.
When you dug into the allegations against Obama, it became apparent that they were blown far out of proportion. You guys tried to label him as some ultra-liberal and yet many Democrat activists are pissed at him because he doesn't push to the extremes and embraces the center. You tried to brand him with past associations and yet every time you looked into the traits that those associations should have burdened him with, he didn't seem to possess them. There was no real infighting within his campaign staff. He seemed to have a calming influence whenever he went into the lion's den of places like Fox News and fundamentalist gatherings.
By the time the election occurred, most people got it. Obama simply wasn't the ogre you were trying to paint him as. Palin and McCain however showed their dark sides over and over. That's the story here Tom.
You're not only a sore loser but your dark side has been displayed over and over. I'm glad a lot of people on this board that were taken in by your smoothness in the past are now opening their eyes a bit.
Oh, and if you're going to post a link, why not include a few sentences that explain what it's about. It's the height of arrogance to just post a link with the implied message: "Read this you idiots."
Art
Flame » in reply to "How Obama got Elected"
What's really interesting to me
The whole thread (45 posts)
- "How Obama got Elected"
- And you claimed OBAMA was elitist?!!!
- And wow, it's amazing how that sneaky liberal media also got Mondale, Dukakis, Gore, and Kerry elected!
- The Wall Street Journal weighs in
- Yet who elects the Right Wing.
- re: "How Obama got Elected"
- How Obama got Elected
- What's really interesting to me
- If I were you, faced with those "facts"
- I remember being with a group in a Christian church in 2004.
- You're STILL losers
- Subtitle: "He Ran as the Anti-Bush"
- Classic. Publishing bad news is not media bias. A train wreck is a train wreck.
- re: "How Obama got Elected"
- re: "How Obama got Elected"
- Gutter politics Tom, you're lending credence to the Yeti. (n/t)
- 538
- More
- re: "How Obama got Elected"
