Art said:
Perhaps you could do something similar for the years the Democrats were in power showing us the death, destruction, and abuse of our Constitution that the liberals caused. Come on. You have all those links on your browser. It's gotta be easy for you.
I responded. That's all.
The current leader of Iraq is worse than Saddam? I'm just going to let that one sit there like a fish rotting in the sun.
By the way, did you notice the president who imprisoned the Japanese-Americans won two large wars in less time than Bush has screwed around in Irag and Afghanistan?
You keep saying this, and keep ignoring exactly how those wars were won. Hint: We didn't get the Axis powers to the surrender table by building new schools in Tokyo and Berlin.
Or maybe your point that it's okay to violate the rights of thousands of U.S. citizens if it helps win the war? Want to think that one over?
Did you notice that Johnson refused to run for president because of Vietnam, that the Democrats were commited to ending that war, that Nixon was the guy who kept it going?
I suspect you actually believe this. Maybe you have to.
Flame » in reply to That fails as badly as "Saddam was worse". (Which isn't true any more.)
Not to risk overclocking you or anything...
