and get it whipped in my face.
So I'm supposed to bow to your alleged thirty years of cherry picking and dismiss any time or effort of my own I might have expended. ¡Que cojones!
When learned experts of different political convictions honestly differ on the interpretations of past events, suddenly your amateurish Googling takes precedence over everyone else's? Sure, your criticisms of my navigation or my suspicions of your spacecraft design might elicit raised eyebrows from a third party, but does either of us have any right to pontificate on camel breeding or harem management?
Your vast political research and erudition is derived from only two basic sources, a desperation to discredit any who disagree with you and a pathetic obsession with some Junior Achievement fantasy on how and why the world should be run by people you fancy are just like yourself. Your ignorance of how the world really works is just as total as your inability to persuade anyone without simultaneously insulting them.
I submit you have done a very poor job of convincing me, or as far as I can tell, anyone else.
Current Events » in reply to Back to the fog
I offer the olive branch
The whole thread (32 posts)
- Will GM Bankruptcy really Tank the ECONOMY?
- It doesn't look good.
- re: It doesn't look good.
- You may very well be right.
- re: You may very well be right.
- So who actually shot JFK?
- Smoke from the correct smoking gun...
- Back to the fog
- I offer the olive branch
- No compromise, no negotiation, my-way-or-the-highway. (n/t)
- olive branch?
- re: olive branch?
- re: olive branch?
- re: olive branch?
- I offer the olive branch
- So who actually shot JFK?
- re: You may very well be right.
- Have you ever looked into the causes of The Great Depression?
- You may very well be right.
- re: It doesn't look good.
- It doesn't look good.
