re: Interesting premise

Off Topic » in reply to And I'd wind up at the extreme length of a rope.

re: Interesting premise

Johannes — 5/22/2009 10:48:49 PM (archived)

Are you hanging me simply on the strength of Buck's assertion that I am a "sucker," or have you scrutinized the evidence that is in favour of my contention, which is that the evidence I see outweighs Buck's assertion.

The whole thread (61 posts)

UFO evidence?? - Johannes - 5/20/2009 3:10:10 AM
- re: I believe that the conclusion is correct. - J - 5/28/2009 8:42:38 PM
- All I can say, J.... - ER - 5/22/2009 2:17:13 AM
  - re: All I can say is that I would go to extreme lengths to find the truth. (n/t) - Johannes - 5/22/2009 5:54:34 PM
    - I believe the truth is there. No credible evidence, yet. No theory, test or artifact. - Bowser - 5/24/2009 8:24:03 PM
      - (There is)No credible evidence, yet. No theory, test or artifact. - Lindy - 5/27/2009 3:30:20 AM
        
        The alien UFO folks have cried "Wolf!" so often it's going to take concrete evidence. - Bowser - 5/28/2009 2:59:48 PM
      - re: I have a theory that could be tested. - J - 5/26/2009 3:56:30 AM
      - re:The problem is accepting the truth. -- I agree (n/t) - Johannes - 5/25/2009 5:16:44 PM
    - And I'd wind up at the extreme length of a rope. - ER - 5/22/2009 6:46:35 PM
      - re: Interesting premise - Johannes - 5/22/2009 10:48:49 PM
        
        Damn - Buck Galaxy - 5/23/2009 7:14:09 AM
        
        re: Damn - Lindy - 5/27/2009 3:37:58 AM
        
        re: Damn. What side is the density on? - Johannes - 5/23/2009 5:06:59 PM
- Neither. It is just another pseudo-documentary about a non-existent event. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 5/20/2009 7:19:27 AM
  - re: Do you have proof that your claim is true? (n/t) - Johannes - 5/20/2009 6:43:10 PM
    - It is OBVIOUS to anyone with critical reasoning abilities. - David F Mayer - 5/26/2009 11:43:33 PM
      - "It was OBVIOUSLY professionally photographed and scripted." - Lindy - 5/27/2009 3:41:28 AM
        
        Bah. Humbug. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 5/31/2009 5:20:10 PM
    - No, no, no J. - ER - 5/20/2009 6:57:56 PM
      - re: I can not believe David until he proves that his statement is true. - Johannes - 5/20/2009 9:36:24 PM
        
        I am afraid that runs both ways Johannes. - Jody - 5/20/2009 10:45:08 PM
        
        Yes Jody - Buck Galaxy - 5/22/2009 6:00:49 AM
        
        Reality bites? - Lindy - 5/27/2009 3:49:50 AM
        
        re:Your assertion is unscientific, you have no proof of your claims. - Johannes - 5/22/2009 5:42:44 PM
        
        Proof = - Buck Galaxy - 5/24/2009 5:22:32 AM
        
        "despite the efforts of many people here to enlighten you" - Lindy - 5/27/2009 3:55:58 AM
        
        re: You seem to be stuck in first gear. - Johannes - 5/25/2009 5:11:53 PM
        
        You've got the brakes on. - Buck Galaxy - 5/25/2009 6:12:11 PM
        
        re: Slight difference - Johannes - 5/26/2009 3:20:57 AM
        
        Show me the peer reviewed scientific paper - Buck Galaxy - 5/27/2009 3:48:24 AM
        
        re: Show me the peer reviewed scientific paper, well HERE IT IS - Lindy - 5/27/2009 4:01:33 AM
        
        Show me a picture - RobVG - 5/28/2009 4:47:54 AM
        
        re: Show me a picture - Lindy - 5/29/2009 4:53:06 AM
        
        No? (n/t) - RobVG - 5/29/2009 1:50:15 AM
        
        I read it... - podrock - 5/27/2009 6:38:48 PM
        
        Exactly - Buck Galaxy - 5/28/2009 2:27:39 AM
        
        Sorry guys.... - Lindy - 5/29/2009 4:57:03 AM
        
        No worries - Buck Galaxy - 5/30/2009 3:35:53 AM
        
        The French guy in Close Encounters was supposed to be Vallee - Socrates II - 5/27/2009 9:03:17 PM
        
        re:No Jody - Johannes - 5/21/2009 12:08:12 AM
        
        We know they were following a script. - ER - 5/20/2009 9:54:26 PM
        
        re: We know they were following a script. - Lindy - 5/27/2009 4:05:34 AM
        
        I've explained to J before - Buck Galaxy - 5/20/2009 10:50:43 PM
        
        re: I agree that proof must be presented - Johannes - 5/20/2009 11:39:56 PM
        
        You have no idea how much egg is on your face - Buck Galaxy - 5/21/2009 5:21:01 AM
        
        re:Their evidence is more convincing than yours. - Johannes - 5/21/2009 4:11:54 PM
        
        A sucker born every minute (n/t) - Buck Galaxy - 5/22/2009 3:59:52 AM
        
        re: Are you familiar with - Johannes - 5/23/2009 12:00:11 AM
        
        "A fire-breathing dragon lives in my garage" - RobVG - 5/21/2009 1:44:24 AM
        
        re: What would happen if someone - Johannes - 5/22/2009 11:15:27 PM
        
        "What I'm asking you to do comes down to believing, in the absence of evidence, on my say-so. " (n/t) - RobVG - 5/23/2009 1:47:59 AM
        
        If the evidence is only your say so, then it is flimsy. - Johannes - 5/23/2009 5:02:04 PM
        
        "several rational people" - Buck Galaxy - 5/24/2009 4:09:42 PM
        
        More info - TB - 5/20/2009 9:48:54 PM
        
        re: The chemical effects were ruled out - Johannes - 5/20/2009 11:28:59 PM
        
        Here's some real, solid evidence - Socrates II - 5/21/2009 1:42:27 PM
        
        I'm really craving a strawberry waffle right now... (n/t) - RobVG - 5/26/2009 4:44:15 AM
        
        re: Now IF it would fly ;-) (n/t) - J - 5/22/2009 11:20:11 PM
        
        Apparently aliens saved Earth in 1908 - Socrates II - 5/27/2009 4:47:46 PM
        
        Nuh uh... - Jody - 5/29/2009 8:17:08 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (61 posts)