re: I agree that proof must be presented

Off Topic » in reply to I've explained to J before

re: I agree that proof must be presented

Johannes — 5/20/2009 11:39:56 PM (archived)

in a scientific discussion, therefore neither your, ER's, or David's claims are scientific because you are not providing any proof that the incident was imagined rather than real.

The whole thread (61 posts)

UFO evidence?? - Johannes - 5/20/2009 3:10:10 AM
- re: I believe that the conclusion is correct. - J - 5/28/2009 8:42:38 PM
- All I can say, J.... - ER - 5/22/2009 2:17:13 AM
  - re: All I can say is that I would go to extreme lengths to find the truth. (n/t) - Johannes - 5/22/2009 5:54:34 PM
    - I believe the truth is there. No credible evidence, yet. No theory, test or artifact. - Bowser - 5/24/2009 8:24:03 PM
      - (There is)No credible evidence, yet. No theory, test or artifact. - Lindy - 5/27/2009 3:30:20 AM
        
        The alien UFO folks have cried "Wolf!" so often it's going to take concrete evidence. - Bowser - 5/28/2009 2:59:48 PM
      - re: I have a theory that could be tested. - J - 5/26/2009 3:56:30 AM
      - re:The problem is accepting the truth. -- I agree (n/t) - Johannes - 5/25/2009 5:16:44 PM
    - And I'd wind up at the extreme length of a rope. - ER - 5/22/2009 6:46:35 PM
      - re: Interesting premise - Johannes - 5/22/2009 10:48:49 PM
        
        Damn - Buck Galaxy - 5/23/2009 7:14:09 AM
        
        re: Damn - Lindy - 5/27/2009 3:37:58 AM
        
        re: Damn. What side is the density on? - Johannes - 5/23/2009 5:06:59 PM
- Neither. It is just another pseudo-documentary about a non-existent event. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 5/20/2009 7:19:27 AM
  - re: Do you have proof that your claim is true? (n/t) - Johannes - 5/20/2009 6:43:10 PM
    - It is OBVIOUS to anyone with critical reasoning abilities. - David F Mayer - 5/26/2009 11:43:33 PM
      - "It was OBVIOUSLY professionally photographed and scripted." - Lindy - 5/27/2009 3:41:28 AM
        
        Bah. Humbug. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 5/31/2009 5:20:10 PM
    - No, no, no J. - ER - 5/20/2009 6:57:56 PM
      - re: I can not believe David until he proves that his statement is true. - Johannes - 5/20/2009 9:36:24 PM
        
        I am afraid that runs both ways Johannes. - Jody - 5/20/2009 10:45:08 PM
        
        Yes Jody - Buck Galaxy - 5/22/2009 6:00:49 AM
        
        Reality bites? - Lindy - 5/27/2009 3:49:50 AM
        
        re:Your assertion is unscientific, you have no proof of your claims. - Johannes - 5/22/2009 5:42:44 PM
        
        Proof = - Buck Galaxy - 5/24/2009 5:22:32 AM
        
        "despite the efforts of many people here to enlighten you" - Lindy - 5/27/2009 3:55:58 AM
        
        re: You seem to be stuck in first gear. - Johannes - 5/25/2009 5:11:53 PM
        
        You've got the brakes on. - Buck Galaxy - 5/25/2009 6:12:11 PM
        
        re: Slight difference - Johannes - 5/26/2009 3:20:57 AM
        
        Show me the peer reviewed scientific paper - Buck Galaxy - 5/27/2009 3:48:24 AM
        
        re: Show me the peer reviewed scientific paper, well HERE IT IS - Lindy - 5/27/2009 4:01:33 AM
        
        Show me a picture - RobVG - 5/28/2009 4:47:54 AM
        
        re: Show me a picture - Lindy - 5/29/2009 4:53:06 AM
        
        No? (n/t) - RobVG - 5/29/2009 1:50:15 AM
        
        I read it... - podrock - 5/27/2009 6:38:48 PM
        
        Exactly - Buck Galaxy - 5/28/2009 2:27:39 AM
        
        Sorry guys.... - Lindy - 5/29/2009 4:57:03 AM
        
        No worries - Buck Galaxy - 5/30/2009 3:35:53 AM
        
        The French guy in Close Encounters was supposed to be Vallee - Socrates II - 5/27/2009 9:03:17 PM
        
        re:No Jody - Johannes - 5/21/2009 12:08:12 AM
        
        We know they were following a script. - ER - 5/20/2009 9:54:26 PM
        
        re: We know they were following a script. - Lindy - 5/27/2009 4:05:34 AM
        
        I've explained to J before - Buck Galaxy - 5/20/2009 10:50:43 PM
        
        re: I agree that proof must be presented - Johannes - 5/20/2009 11:39:56 PM
        
        You have no idea how much egg is on your face - Buck Galaxy - 5/21/2009 5:21:01 AM
        
        re:Their evidence is more convincing than yours. - Johannes - 5/21/2009 4:11:54 PM
        
        A sucker born every minute (n/t) - Buck Galaxy - 5/22/2009 3:59:52 AM
        
        re: Are you familiar with - Johannes - 5/23/2009 12:00:11 AM
        
        "A fire-breathing dragon lives in my garage" - RobVG - 5/21/2009 1:44:24 AM
        
        re: What would happen if someone - Johannes - 5/22/2009 11:15:27 PM
        
        "What I'm asking you to do comes down to believing, in the absence of evidence, on my say-so. " (n/t) - RobVG - 5/23/2009 1:47:59 AM
        
        If the evidence is only your say so, then it is flimsy. - Johannes - 5/23/2009 5:02:04 PM
        
        "several rational people" - Buck Galaxy - 5/24/2009 4:09:42 PM
        
        More info - TB - 5/20/2009 9:48:54 PM
        
        re: The chemical effects were ruled out - Johannes - 5/20/2009 11:28:59 PM
        
        Here's some real, solid evidence - Socrates II - 5/21/2009 1:42:27 PM
        
        I'm really craving a strawberry waffle right now... (n/t) - RobVG - 5/26/2009 4:44:15 AM
        
        re: Now IF it would fly ;-) (n/t) - J - 5/22/2009 11:20:11 PM
        
        Apparently aliens saved Earth in 1908 - Socrates II - 5/27/2009 4:47:46 PM
        
        Nuh uh... - Jody - 5/29/2009 8:17:08 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (61 posts)