omfg what a crock of sh!t
Your ‘definition’ allows us to cavalierly accept all manner of brutal oppression and economic exploitation because it doesn’t meet a set of criteria you happen to feel comfortable with, and that leaves every crooked gangster businessman conveniently off the hook.
What an utterly absurd statement. Because ONE WORD doesn't fit the definition of a certain type of abuse, then that abuse is just fine and dandy!? Dude, your arguments here are getting weaker every time.