Another insightful post.
It's hard for those who got used to the old format to realize how unique it was among forum architectures.
There was a clear tree structure that made it obvious who originated posts, and who was replying to what.
The color changes (an artifact of browser history structure and the forums URL-style connection system) make it instantly visible what you had read and what was new.
This made back-and-forth debate easier, although maybe that's just a plus for those of us who like the smell of the arena.
The new architecture does have some virtues:
URL link language is simpler, except for picture links.
Dude, there's a SEARCH FUNCTION. That doesn't exactly suck. Be careful not to invoke it while you're typing a post, though. Everything you did will be gone when you come back.
There are more tools, but I don't use them much.
You can't "lurk." Not sure if that's a bug or a feature.
Geek Speak » in reply to Thoughts on the interface.
Re: Thoughts on the interface.
The whole thread (15 posts)
- Thoughts on the interface.
- Re: Re: The community catbox
- Re: The community catbox
- The community catbox
- Re: who's on line
- Everything said is going to be true.
- Re: Getting rid of who's on line would probably be a good idea
- Getting rid of who's on line would probably be a good idea
- Thanks
- Re: No apology necessary
- Remarkable
- Re: Thoughts on the interface.
