I think this is wrong for two reasons

Space/Science » in reply to Re: It stops at 1950 and calls that time "now"

pwokenyaw — 12/9/2009 9:11:05 PM (archived)

First, as I just noted, the data series actually seems to stop at 1900 and not 1950.

Second, it appears the commenter just appended global data to the local data record. That's apples and oranges - global data should be compared to global records, not what happened in a single location in high-altitude Greenland.

The whole thread (18 posts)

Climate: Historical perspective - TB - 12/8/2009 3:33:54 AM
- Perspective - robert - 12/9/2009 4:52:05 PM
  - To quote from a certain Spike Lee film. - Lee - 12/9/2009 7:33:15 PM
  - Re: traumatic - TB - 12/9/2009 6:45:16 PM
- Re: It stops at 1950 and calls that time "now" - Nick_H - 12/9/2009 12:58:38 AM
  - Re: Re: It stops at 1950 and calls that time "now" - TAFKASE - 12/9/2009 10:46:12 PM
    - Re: Re: Re: It stops at 1950 and calls that time "now" - pwokenyaw - 12/10/2009 5:42:51 AM
  - I think this is wrong for two reasons - pwokenyaw - 12/9/2009 9:11:05 PM
- It stops at 1950 and calls that time "now" - pwokenyaw - 12/8/2009 8:27:03 PM
  - Sorry, it actually stops at 1900 and calls it "now" - pwokenyaw - 12/9/2009 9:11:05 PM
    - Re: Sorry, it actually stops at 1900 - TB - 12/9/2009 9:27:11 PM
      - Re: Re: Sorry, it actually stops at 1900 - pwokenyaw - 12/9/2009 10:32:15 PM
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Sorry, it actually stops at 1900 - pwokenyaw - 12/10/2009 5:42:51 AM
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sorry, it actually stops at 1900 - TB - 12/10/2009 5:34:59 PM
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sorry, it actually stops at 1900 - pwokenyaw - 12/10/2009 9:27:21 PM
        
        Re: Re: Re: Sorry, it actually stops at 1900 - TB - 12/9/2009 11:41:19 PM
  - Re: "now" - TB - 12/9/2009 12:23:02 AM
- Re: Climate: Historical perspective - mcfly - 12/8/2009 6:17:41 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (18 posts)

Related discussions