It's funny how differntly we both react to this guy, even though we both believe he's crazier than a bedbug.
I see him as mistakenly injecting anthropocentric arguments to an essentially natural (and totally amoral) evolutionary phenomenon.
You see him as evidence of the degeneracy of Western academic intellectual ideas and how they threaten your own social Darwinist world views and their inevitable hyper-competitive extrapolations. Which by the way, I also see as mistakenly injecting anthropocentric arguments to an essentially natural phenomenon.
As for your observations about children, I totally agree. But I figure that as long as I don't threaten anyone's kids, I am under no obligation to have any of my own.
Personally, I think they smell bad, especially when they're wet.
Flame » in reply to A thought experiment from Peter Singer
Re: Re: navel-gazing
The whole thread (45 posts)
- A thought experiment from Peter Singer
- The Golden Rule
- Right!
- Re: Re: Re: Darwinism
- Re: Shifting gears but along the same line..
- Shifting gears but along the same line..
- Re: Re: Darwinism
- Re: Darwinism
- Darwinism
- Re: You might be making this too complicated.
- This whole thing is crap.
- You might be making this too complicated.
- Not every one is a materialist ER.
- *sigh*...lowering my head and shaking it*
- Re: By your own admission
- heh...very good Rob...and on that note...
- The difference is, you followed your biological clock.
- By your own admission
- Re: Not every one is a materialist ER.
- Wow...
- Re: Re: navel-gazing
- Re: navel-gazing
- Typical philozawifigal navel-gazing BS.
