I do have to agree: WikiLeaks should keep tabs on what it does and doesn't release. It's main purpose was meant to be a whistleblowing sight for wrosngs committed by governments, businesses, and other organizations, and that should be it's main focus. The matter of transparency of government, while desirable, should be left to politics.

Also? Anonymous does have potential. True, what they do can be considered illegal, but think of it like this: How are they different from the student protesters of the 60's and 70's? Instead of protesting the actions of just our government however, they protest the actions of governments and businesses in general. I believe this half is known as "Project Chanology". Anonymous HAS started as a troll group, but it seems to have evolved. What once was a group of unorganised people now seem to be working together against internet censorship and doing it the only way they know how: through protests and DDOS attacks. If they organised hemselves a little further, well.....

I wonder what Jung would have to say about them?