Flame » in reply to Moral equivalence

The whole thread (16 posts)

• Moral equivalence - Bowser - 3/19/2003 4:34:19 PM
  • Re: Moral equivalence - Tom Brosz - 3/19/2003 5:29:10 PM
    • 180 out of phase. As usual. - Bowser - 3/20/2003 3:11:58 PM
      • Re: 180 out of phase. - Tom Brosz - 3/20/2003 4:43:13 PM
        • Heh, heh. It was suicide. - Bowser - 3/20/2003 5:14:39 PM
          • It was suicide - Tom Brosz - 3/20/2003 6:51:07 PM
            • If the Mossad - - - - Bowser - 3/20/2003 2:52:11 PM
              • Re: If the Mossad - - - - Tom Brosz - 3/20/2003 3:14:37 PM
  • Yes!! - Saddam Insane - 3/19/2003 5:04:30 PM
    • OOOh! Thats original! Trademark that! - Davin L - 3/19/2003 5:39:15 PM
      • And you're like what...42? (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 3/19/2003 6:43:09 PM
        • Thankfully, no... Not yet anyway! (n/t) - Davin L. - 3/20/2003 3:41:54 PM
  • If by 'equivalence' you mean 'not equal' - ebnelson - 3/19/2003 4:59:57 PM
  • aren't I Supposed to be you? - Davin L. - 3/19/2003 4:57:01 PM
    • What's a "Davin"? - Bowser - 3/19/2003 5:23:27 PM
      • couldn't have said it better myself, or did I? - Davin DottedQuad L. - 3/19/2003 5:37:11 PM