Flame » in reply to Re: cock-eyed Christians

The whole thread (21 posts)

• For Scott - Lindy - 4/7/2003 9:41:26 AM
  • Lindy, not to put to fine a point on it - ebnelson - 4/8/2003 4:35:14 PM
  • I agree. Our mission in Iraq has nothing to do with morality - Scott - 4/7/2003 11:46:18 AM
    • I think you get a false sense of security from this "war" - Lindy - 4/7/2003 4:20:08 PM
    • Are you sure, Scott - LJ - 4/7/2003 3:50:00 PM
      • Just wait until the EPA gets in there and sets up a mirror agency in the new Iraqi Government - Scott - 4/8/2003 2:50:46 PM
        • Well that's about as realistic - LJ - 4/8/2003 3:31:01 PM
      • Re: Are you sure, Scott - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2003 8:38:03 AM
        • There's a story among the Romany - Mary Anne - 4/8/2003 12:47:46 PM
          • Very nice, but not too accurate as an analogy. - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2003 4:15:21 PM
            • It's a parable, not an equation. - Mary Anne - 4/8/2003 7:12:34 PM
            • Huh? I think you kind of missed the point, Tom. n/t (n/t) - LJ - 4/8/2003 4:59:37 PM
          • Re: Yes - Raoul - 4/8/2003 3:52:02 PM
          • Thank you, Mary Anne - an eloquent touch n/t (n/t) - LJ - 4/8/2003 3:32:17 PM
            • You can take a gypsy to water, but you can't make it drink - Lindy - 4/8/2003 3:39:29 PM
  • Re: cock-eyed Christians - Tom Brosz - 4/7/2003 10:34:09 AM
    • Re: cock-eyed Christians - pwokenyaw - 4/8/2003 4:20:46 PM
    • Is it even proper for a Christian to say the word cock? (n/t) (n/t) - Lee - 4/8/2003 9:34:30 AM
    • Principled war? - Lindy - 4/7/2003 4:31:43 PM
      • Re: Principled war? - McFly - 4/8/2003 1:49:01 PM
      • Re: Principled war? - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2003 8:32:34 AM