Off Topic » in reply to Well, now, Studley.

The whole thread (28 posts)

• T. B. - Moving this NRA comment to Off-topic. - Bowser - 10/11/2002 7:33:43 PM
  • Jeez...what backwaters do you hail from? - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/12/2002 8:22:58 AM
  • Thousands of people have concealed carry permits here in Colorado Springs - Larry J - 10/11/2002 7:41:41 PM
    • A very small, super-paranoid minority. - Bowser - 10/11/2002 9:17:31 AM
      • But of course the facts tell a very different story. - ebnelson - 10/11/2002 9:36:20 AM
    • Re: Now, that's funny . . . - D. Spires - 10/11/2002 8:55:23 AM
      • Heh, heh, heh!! - Bowser - 10/11/2002 1:35:54 PM
        • You are one sick puppy - FrankC - 10/12/2002 4:16:07 PM
          • Moi! - Bowser - 10/13/2002 5:03:17 PM
            • Billy Jack's bad memory - FrankC - 10/14/2002 2:14:24 PM
              • Well, now, Studley. - Bowser - 10/14/2002 11:17:11 AM
                • I understand now why your so quick to attack the President - Scott - 10/15/2002 8:59:44 AM
                • Whatever do you mean? - FrankC - 10/14/2002 4:00:26 PM
                • LOL! - Tom Brosz - 10/14/2002 12:28:28 PM
        • Re: Heh, heh, heh!! - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2002 2:34:47 PM
          • Re: Heh, heh, heh!! - ebnelson - 10/12/2002 3:46:19 PM
        • Re: Ha, ha, ha!! - D. Spires - 10/11/2002 1:57:17 PM
    • They used this argument about 5 years ago in Texas - Scott - 10/11/2002 8:40:50 AM
      • It wouldn't surprise me if a lot of loons live where Bowser lives... - Larry J - 10/11/2002 8:52:39 AM
        • From what Bowser talks about his quick temper - ebnelson - 10/12/2002 12:58:33 PM
  • Concealed weapons - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2002 2:27:35 PM
  • Stick this in your pipe.... - RobVG - 10/11/2002 2:09:52 PM
  • What about LA? - FrankC - 10/11/2002 10:18:33 AM
  • The NRA does what? - ebnelson - 10/11/2002 9:38:25 AM
  • So you support disarming Iraq? - Scott - 10/11/2002 8:37:25 AM
    • Conversely... - Robert - 10/11/2002 11:21:27 AM
      • He's already "gunned down" many people without provocation. (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2002 2:29:01 PM
      • Re: The fact that he has, and likely will again, used them without provokation is provokation enough for us . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 10/11/2002 11:59:44 AM