Re: Tunguska

Neil C — 7/24/2001 9:24:49 AM (archived)

Please forgive me, but I don't think there's a whole lot of wiggle room here.
The evidence indicates an airburst of (X) potential.

When you shake out the UFO nuts, it is pretty clear that the event was caused by either a Comet or an Asteroid.

The whole thread (21 posts)

Tunguska - LJ - 7/23/2001 10:34:51 AM
- Re: Tunguska - LL - 7/24/2001 4:16:21 PM
  - Re: Tunguska - Mark Eby - 7/24/2001 4:39:18 PM
    - Re: Tunguska - LJ - 7/24/2001 5:31:19 PM
    - Correction - Mark Eby - 7/24/2001 5:09:52 PM
      - Re: Correction - LJ - 7/24/2001 5:48:49 PM
  - Re: Tunguska - LJ - 7/24/2001 4:18:56 PM
- Re: Tunguska - Neil C - 7/24/2001 9:24:49 AM
- Re: Tunguska - Matt - 7/23/2001 12:06:52 PM
- Re: Tunguska - Mark Eby - 7/23/2001 12:04:40 PM
  - Welcome Back... - E.P. Grondine - 7/23/2001 2:30:50 PM
    - Was There A Point There? - Mark Eby - 7/24/2001 3:37:57 PM
      - As usual, the points fly right by... - E.P. Grondine - 7/24/2001 12:23:32 PM
        
        The Obvious & The Misleading - Mark Eby - 7/24/2001 2:18:08 PM
        
        The Oblivious & The Misinformed - E.P. Grondine - 7/24/2001 3:50:21 PM
        
        Have Another Laugh - Mark Eby - 7/25/2001 3:12:51 PM
        
        Not as good as the piece a little further down this page - E.P. Grondine - 7/25/2001 6:11:09 PM
        
        Actually Far Better - Mark Eby - 7/25/2001 6:43:06 PM
        
        Re: Not as good as the piece a little further down this page - Dr. Impact - 7/25/2001 10:28:28 AM
- Re: Tunguska - Tom Brosz - 7/23/2001 11:35:41 AM
  - My wife and I visited Meteor Crater last month - Larry J - 7/23/2001 12:10:44 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (21 posts)