Re: Tunguska

Tom Brosz — 7/23/2001 11:35:41 AM (archived)

<If correct, this explanation would somewhat weaken the NEO impact threat, I suppose.

Not really. There's still that big hole in Arizona to look at and think about. Not to mention a load of dead dinosaurs.

The whole thread (21 posts)

Tunguska - LJ - 7/23/2001 10:34:51 AM
- Re: Tunguska - LL - 7/24/2001 4:16:21 PM
  - Re: Tunguska - Mark Eby - 7/24/2001 4:39:18 PM
    - Re: Tunguska - LJ - 7/24/2001 5:31:19 PM
    - Correction - Mark Eby - 7/24/2001 5:09:52 PM
      - Re: Correction - LJ - 7/24/2001 5:48:49 PM
  - Re: Tunguska - LJ - 7/24/2001 4:18:56 PM
- Re: Tunguska - Neil C - 7/24/2001 9:24:49 AM
- Re: Tunguska - Matt - 7/23/2001 12:06:52 PM
- Re: Tunguska - Mark Eby - 7/23/2001 12:04:40 PM
  - Welcome Back... - E.P. Grondine - 7/23/2001 2:30:50 PM
    - Was There A Point There? - Mark Eby - 7/24/2001 3:37:57 PM
      - As usual, the points fly right by... - E.P. Grondine - 7/24/2001 12:23:32 PM
        
        The Obvious & The Misleading - Mark Eby - 7/24/2001 2:18:08 PM
        
        The Oblivious & The Misinformed - E.P. Grondine - 7/24/2001 3:50:21 PM
        
        Have Another Laugh - Mark Eby - 7/25/2001 3:12:51 PM
        
        Not as good as the piece a little further down this page - E.P. Grondine - 7/25/2001 6:11:09 PM
        
        Actually Far Better - Mark Eby - 7/25/2001 6:43:06 PM
        
        Re: Not as good as the piece a little further down this page - Dr. Impact - 7/25/2001 10:28:28 AM
- Re: Tunguska - Tom Brosz - 7/23/2001 11:35:41 AM
  - My wife and I visited Meteor Crater last month - Larry J - 7/23/2001 12:10:44 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (21 posts)