As usual, the points fly right by...
Point one, no understanding of cumulative risk, no matter whose hazard estimate is used. Even 1% of the total hazard is a lot of peoples' lives.
Point two, citation of one estimate of hazard risk, the lowest found, and claiming it as the only estimate.
Point three, no understanding of how weak all hazard risk estimates are, and
Point four, no understanding of where those weaknesses come from.
EP