<... today the technology is far better than it was in '83 such as the Hubbell and other space and land based observational systems. So reconfirming shouldn't be a problem. In fact, it should be a given in light of the earlier "failed analysis" and the current unprecedented growing support of the Planet X. Science has become very political lately. It has lost its true direction by those who feel hierarchical political motivations should take precedence over pure curiosity and keen observations.
The mere fact that it has NOT been sighted again supports my previous posting that it doesn't exist.
Then again, you may be right. Maybe the politicians of the WORLD all got together and voted Planet X out of existence.
Tell you what. You elect me president of the world and support my funding demands and I'll personally build Planet X for you. Hell, I'll even design it to smack into the earth a few times (that'll show 'em).
P.S. When are you going to present your pyramid cement theory to the masses and enlighten us all? Of course you would have to provide some evidence or proof. You do have evidence don't you?
Not mine. I just happen to agree with the man that the pyramids were designed and built by -- dare I say it? -- humans. See Dr. Joseph Davidovits. This is stuff I like the professionals to explain, and they do a fine job of it.
Dan
Space/Science » in reply to Re: Their 'mythical' planet could have been anything . . .
Re: A simple web-search away . . .
The whole thread (39 posts)
- 250 million years ago something unknown wiped out most life on our planet.