<SACRE BLEU!!
I'm sure there are equivalent formulations of the current paradigm of science possible. However, it takes more than bluster and "pretty pictures" to extract any predictive power.
"The coriolis force is fine as far as it goes..which is not very far. Like all science it can survive a comprehensive 'update'."
The Coriolis Force is so well understood, and has been for so long that i'm getting drowsy just defending it. Macroscopic classical physics that
describe this so called force was mature and boring before the 1900's.
"Defining energy and the substance of the universe is not a task for the faint of heart. "
Nor is it a task apparently, for the faint of mind.
You may speak Latin and French, mon friar. But you've yet to learn the language of science. As for me, I'm through sending my "unintelligable gibberish" your way.
Space/Science » in reply to Le vrai n'est pas toujours vraisemblable...
The Marque de SDAI
The whole thread (26 posts)
- Thoughts on why spiral galaxy NGC 4622 has a "reverse" spin.
- Re: Thoughts on why spiral galaxy NGC 4622 has a
- I saw the article and frankly, I don't have a clue
- Elementary my dear Watson...er.. Vince