More declarations without support EP. Many resources available online state radar is for refining orbits not detection. For example:
http://www.nearearthobjects.co.uk/report/chapter5.htm
http://impact.arc.nasa.gov/reports/spaceguard/sg_5.html
and most importantly
http://impact.arc.nasa.gov/reports/spaceguard/sg_6.html#6.4
"However, radar observations do not become feasible until the object's expected position can be refined (from optical astrometry) to better than about 1 arcmin, and an accuracy of 10 arcsec or better is preferable. A single radar detection has a fractional precision that is two or three orders of magnitude beyond that of optical astrometry, so the inclusion of radar data with the optical data in the orbit solution can quickly and dramatically reduce the future ephemeris uncertainty. "
Who exactly do you claim supports using them for detection?
Also please tell me which of the search programs listed at http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/stats.html you think are radar based? If none why do you suppose that is?
Also why do continuously seek to prove that you are far from an impact expert counter to your claims by making these easily disproven claims?
Regards,
Mark
Space/Science » in reply to I'll disagree...
So Why Do All These Reports Disagree?