wavelength versus intensity?

Space/Science » in reply to Re: This is a marvelous breakthrough; and it has space applications!~

Mark Eby — 11/18/2002 6:14:24 PM (archived)

I believe the definition of each type is determined by wavelength. The energy is determined by both wavelenth and amplitude. A short wavelength high intensity x-ray can have more energy than a low intensity long wavlength gamma-ray.

I'm guessing efficiency varies with wavelength but overall absorbance is also a capacity issue influenced by total energy absorbed.

Regards,
Mark

The whole thread (14 posts)

This is a marvelous breakthrough; and it has space applications!~ - Jacob Samorodin - 11/15/2002 3:17:04 PM
- Re: This is a marvelous breakthrough; and it has space applications!~ - ectoterrestrial - 11/15/2002 7:37:52 PM
  - wavelength versus intensity? - Mark Eby - 11/18/2002 6:14:24 PM
    - Au contraire mon friar.... - ectoterrestrial - 11/18/2002 7:27:34 PM
      - Definition Is By Wavelength - Mark Eby - 11/19/2002 3:02:44 PM
        
        Re: Definition Is by whatever the hell you want it to be. - et - 11/19/2002 9:12:14 AM
        
        OK - good point N/T (n/t) - Mark Eby - 11/20/2002 2:47:15 PM
- Home page - Tom Brosz - 11/15/2002 4:37:07 PM
  - Re: Yes . . . - D. Spires - 11/18/2002 5:44:28 PM
    - Re: Should read as just over 1/2 the load, as in just over 50 percent . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 11/18/2002 5:47:54 PM
  - Science Fiction - Tom Brosz - 11/15/2002 4:45:12 PM
- Fabric - RobVG - 11/15/2002 4:04:56 PM
  - If they can manufacture it for a reasonable price, there is a huge market in the medical community alone. - Larry J - 11/15/2002 7:08:11 PM
- Re: This is a marvelous breakthrough; and it has space applications!~ - gbaikie - 11/15/2002 11:43:57 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (14 posts)