BD wrote:
You sure are a hot head lately! Plus you have make no relevant contribution with regards the Carr paper. Hoffamn told me Carr was coming round to his thinking. Well? Where is the evidence to support that?

Alex writes:
I take Nick at his word recounting his personal conversations with Mike Carr and others? He has never lied here or anywhere else that I know of. More importantly, where is your evidence supporting your view that Nick's conversation with Mike Carr is untrue?

BD wrote:
So what is your point here? - criticize me for posting a peer reviewed science paper favoring liquid water over CO2? What's your problem with it? If you support Nicks's CO2 hypothesis come out and say so, don't ride the middle of the highway.. where do you stand?

Alex writes:
I've never ridden "the middle of the highway"; in fact, I've always maintained here and elsewhere that I support the H2O models. That said, I do respect Nick's work and his professional attitude.

BD writes:
As regards Levin, he is much more of a scientist than you could ever hope to be. Here is his body of work (below), now how about showing us yours?

Alex writes:
Irrelevant. I never claimed that Levin wasn't a professional scientist only that you don't seem to act like one. In fact, rather than casting red herrings and hiding behind Levin, why don't you emulate his behavior?

I guess that about say it all. I've finished any semblance of discourse with you. Good bye.

Alex R. Blackwell
University of Hawaii