Alex writes:
I take Nick at his word recounting his personal conversations with Mike Carr and others? He has never lied here or anywhere else that I know of. More importantly, where is your evidence supporting your view that Nick's conversation with Mike Carr is untrue?

Carr's paper. I suppose if he supports CO2 flows on Mars, his abstract(s) at the 34th LPSC will be supporting this right?

Alex writes: Irrelevant. I never claimed that Levin wasn't a professional scientist only that you don't seem to act like one.

Like a lot of your buddies here, you have indeed criticized Levin several times in a most unprofessional manner.

Alex writes: In fact, rather than casting red herrings and hiding behind Levin, why don't you emulate his behavior?

Huh? What on Earth do you mean by this? What behavior? You mean Levin's sticking to his data in spite of peer pressure from scientists like you who resort to name calling. Call yourself what you will. If you think your behavior is so eloquent -- think again.

Alex: I guess that about say it all. I've finished any semblance of discourse with you. Good bye.

Fine by me. Go take your professional insults elsewhere.

BD

PS - You didn't say if you support Hoffman's CO2 flows hypothesis? I don't fear saying that I support Levin's conclusions.