Which set do you prefer?
Christianity claims an ethic of peace and love. Hence Christians have to bend over backwards to justify violence. And they do, regularly.
If you want an example of Christians who don't resort to this kind of thing as a matter of principle, I suggest you explore the Anabaptist sects. You will notice that they are far less numerous than many other Christian denominations that justify violent behavior.
I do not imply that religious belief (as a facet of tribal or national identity) has no place in the wars of other peoples. I simply state what I consider obvious: Christianity opposes violence against others in principle, and Christians who have paid any attention to their religion know this. Therefore, Christians by their very faith hold themselves to higher standards of humane behavior and when they fail to uphold those standards (a frequent historical occurrence) they have farther to fall, for they have to deal not only with violence but also hypocrisy.
Regards--
Mary Anne
Current Events » in reply to Not a Current Event, but anti-Christian sentiment pops up in our political arena quite frequently
Turning the other cheek
The whole thread (28 posts)
- What the left is working on while you watch TV
- Hang Tough Tom
- Re: Actually, not too far from the truth . . .
- -sigh-
- Tennassee or the reporter?
- Re: -sigh-
- Columbus has become a scapegoat of history
- It is not funny. NGO sounds like a noble group.
- Third world = Robbing Hoods
- Hang Tough Tom
