I forgot. You're the guy who KNOWS what the Founding Fathers meant by the Second Amendment, regardless of the Supreme Court and laws.

It shouldn't surprise me that you want now to re-define words to fit your own narrow view, dictionary be damned! The common usage is for the common, not the people who know. I mean really know.

Well, you hit on the tariffs. Screw free trade, insure higher costs to people so corporations can pay dividends and executives.

He had to choose, and did. You said leave that out. Why? Because it doesn't fit your tortured excuses?

Most of the time "free enterprise" will work for rich people, so he doesn't have to choose. However, when he does, he goes for the super-rich.

But, continue your syncophantic ways, keep torturing the language, changing definitions and making excuses. The logic of it collapses, and you're left telling the naked little monkey how beautiful his new clothes are. Every emperor needs his syncophants, every cheerleader his cheerleaders. Keep watching him talk capitalism and acting kleptocracy.

When one stands back and watches the tap-dancing you do when you have to confront the truth of his actions it's really sort of humorous.

Now, I'm using "humorous" to mean the quality of something which makes it amusing or laughable.

Arf