Current Events » in reply to Re: supposed controversy

The whole thread (19 posts)

• supposed clues re: 9/11 - McFly - 5/16/2002 5:37:08 PM
  • Re: supposed clues re: 9/11 - p - 5/16/2002 6:59:44 PM
  • Couple of thoughts - Bowser - 5/16/2002 9:57:33 AM
    • Re: Couple of thoughts - Tom Brosz - 5/16/2002 11:16:05 AM
      • Another one. - Bowser - 5/16/2002 11:43:56 AM
  • Re: supposed clues re: 9/11 = The attack on the SS Cole. n/t (n/t) - Marcia - 5/16/2002 9:30:49 AM
    • Re: Absolutely . . . - D. Spires - 5/16/2002 11:48:33 AM
      • I think that proper use of intel... - alcaray - 5/17/2002 4:59:49 PM
  • Re: supposed controversy - Tom Brosz - 5/16/2002 8:00:29 AM
    • The exact nature of the intel is not yet published - alcaray - 5/16/2002 8:27:08 AM
      • And the Democrats and press AREN'T jumping the gun? (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 5/16/2002 9:15:14 AM
        • No, Democrats and press *and Republicans* calling for an investigation are not jumping the gun. n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 5/16/2002 9:30:23 AM
          • An investigation - Tom Brosz - 5/16/2002 9:39:00 AM
            • Certainly you are right that investigations can be or become politically-driven messes. - alcaray - 5/16/2002 9:53:01 AM
              • Investigation politically-driven. - Tom Brosz - 5/16/2002 11:33:19 AM
                • Re: Investigation politically-driven. - Buck Galaxy - 5/17/2002 4:17:00 PM
                • Kind of insulting to Ken Starr, isn't it? - Bowser - 5/16/2002 6:05:50 PM
                • I appreciate your misgivings, but... - alcaray - 5/16/2002 11:57:52 AM
    • This may backfire much worse than Daschle's last two idiotic moves. - ebnelson - 5/16/2002 8:17:15 AM