That was a crash-course I took last night, so my subject line really is a question.
Regardless, I find no justification for the continued violence and, political movements on either side not withstanding, the only way in which total relief may be realized is through complete segregation of the two "peoples".
Which brings us back to the stupid "wall" idea, which is doomed to failure simply because it will stand as a reminder to all that:
1. Peace cannot exist in the Middle East
2. The Arab world lost land
3. The Western world squatted land
4. The rest of the world not only allowed this to happen, they cheered the UN on
I wonder which nation would be attacked by Israel and/or Palestine if the world simply ignored the lot of them.
Dan
Current Events » in reply to Right, and British Mandate Palestine was to be primarily an Arab state with a tiny Jewish state
Re: And Israel is not . . . ?
The whole thread (34 posts)
- Twenty facts about Israel and the Middle East
- Re: To colonize or not....
- This is your idea of "fair and balanced"??? n/t (n/t)
- Re: Truths are not facts . . .
- So many mistakes it one piece that it is almost impossible to take them one at a time
- Fact one.
- Your obscure, irrelevant and misleading quotes not withstanding
- Re: Well . . .
- Someone else's land
- Re: Yes, someone else's land . . .
- Re: Yes, someone else's land . . .
- Re: Well, maybe Australians and North & South Americans should all move back to Europe . . .
- Seems like it.
- 2000 years vs. 50? Yes it matters.
- Re: Yes, someone else's land . . .
- Re: Someone else's land
- Re: Yes, someone else's land . . .
- Exactly, Dan. If the UN gave it away, they should have IMPOSED a solution
- Someone else's land
- Re: Well . . .
- Your obscure, irrelevant and misleading quotes not withstanding
