Evidence proving Bush should be impeached?

Current Events » in reply to Dang! Gone for three days and I'm three pages behind.

p — 6/28/2002 5:46:28 PM (archived)

Is here. Seem clear cut to moi. The religious test is disallowed by our constitution while the abortion litmus test is not.

This is such a BS issue. Started by pointy headed outa touch liberal activists and feeding frenzied by almost every pol.

-p (we're at WAR people)

The whole thread (15 posts)

Dang! Gone for three days and I'm three pages behind. - Tom Brosz - 6/28/2002 5:02:30 PM
- The First Amendment *always* applies, Tom - Mary Anne - 6/29/2002 6:47:00 PM
  - Disney character - Tom Brosz - 6/29/2002 8:07:51 AM
- We missed you. - Bowser - 6/28/2002 6:26:33 PM
  - Missed you too, but I noticed my ulcer got smaller ;) - Tom Brosz - 6/28/2002 7:23:34 PM
    - Re: W’ll, yeah . . . - D. Spires - 6/28/2002 10:33:28 AM
      - Re: W’ll, yeah . . . - Tom Brosz - 6/28/2002 11:00:21 AM
- Evidence proving Bush should be impeached? - p - 6/28/2002 5:46:28 PM
  - Hysteria - Bowser - 6/28/2002 6:31:03 PM
  - Re: Evidence proving Bush should be impeached? - O'Leary - 6/28/2002 9:26:32 AM
  - Well, saying that and applying a religious test are extremely diferent things. § (n/t) - ebnelson - 6/28/2002 8:01:17 AM
- Oh yeah, then there's this... - Tom Brosz - 6/28/2002 5:30:51 PM
  - Well, this is a worry. - Bowser - 6/29/2002 7:27:00 PM
    - No worries, mate. - Tom Brosz - 6/29/2002 8:06:12 AM
  - They don't want reguation, they want money. - ebnelson - 6/28/2002 8:57:25 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (15 posts)